<img src="images/laptop_timeline.png" alt="A laptop showing a project timeline">
You are a project manager at Teklyhealth, a software development company that specializes in data analytics solutions for healthcare organizations. As a project manager, your primary responsibility is to lead the development team and ensure the successful delivery of high-quality software projects to clients.
[[Let's get started!]]
<img src="images/Jake_talking.png" alt="Jake, a 30-year-old white man with light brown hair talking in a modern office conference room">
You gather your development team for the weekly project status meeting.
Jake, the Senior Developer, kicks off the meeting, "Alright team, we're a week behind schedule on the Healthtrack project, and the client still hasn't provided the data integration requirements we requested three weeks ago."
The Lead Developer, Samantha, interjects, "Without those requirements, we can't properly design the system architecture. We risk making assumptions that could lead to costly rework down the line."
Jake responds, "We can't afford to keep falling behind. We should make our best educated guesses based on our experience and move forward."
Alex, the UI Designer, weighs in, "I'm with Samantha on this. If we don't get the integration requirements right, it could severely impact the user experience and data flow."
As the project manager, you have three options:
[[Proceed with reasonable assumptions.]]
[[Wait for client input.]]
[[Proceed with partial development, deferring data integration.]]{(set: $Quality to it -1)}
<img src="images/Samantha_talking.png" alt="Samantha, a multiracial woman talking in a modern office conference room">
You decide to side with Jake and instruct the team to make reasonable assumptions about the missing data integration requirements to keep the project moving forward.
Samantha is visibly concerned, "I understand the need to stay on schedule, but making assumptions on critical requirements is risky. We might end up with technical debt that needs to be addressed later."
Jake nods, "I hear your concerns, Samantha, but we can't afford to be paralyzed by indecision. We'll document our assumptions clearly and be prepared to adapt if needed."
Alex chimes in, "Let's do our best to anticipate the client's needs based on our experience with similar projects."
The team proceeds with development, making educated guesses about the missing requirements.
[[Continue->New Request]]{(set: $Quality to it+1)}
<img src="images/Samantha_arms_crossed.png" alt="Samantha, a multiracial woman, sitting with her arms crossed in a modern office conference room">
You side with Samantha and Alex, deciding to hold off on further development until the client provides the necessary information regarding the data integration requirements.
"I understand the pressure to stay on schedule," you tell the team, "but making assumptions about critical requirements is a risk we can't afford to take."
Samantha looks relieved. "Thank you for prioritizing quality. Moving forward without a clear understanding of the client's needs could lead to costly rework down the line."
Jake seems slightly disappointed but nods in agreement. "You're right. It's better to pause now than to waste effort going down the wrong path."
The team agrees to switch gears and work on some other outstanding projects while they wait for the needed information.
[[Receive the client information.]]{(set: $Quality to it+1)}
<img src="images/Samantha_talking.png" alt="Samantha, a multiracial woman talking in a modern office conference room">
You turn to the team and outline the next steps. "We'll focus our efforts on the areas where we have clear requirements, but all work related to the data integration layer will be put on hold until we receive the missing information from the client."
The team agrees to adjust their plans accordingly, deferring tasks related to the data integration components while continuing progress on other aspects of the project.
[[Receive the client information.]] {<!--These are the starting values for the story-wide variables. This passage with the startup tag is run behind the scenes before anything else in the scenario.-->
(set: $Days to 60)
(set: $ElapsedDays to 0)
(set: $Cost to 50000)
(set: $Quality to 6)
(set: $Satisfaction to 6)}
{(set: $ElapsedDays to it+7)}
<img src="images/Zahra_talking.png" alt="Zahra, a woman wearing a hijab, talking in a conference room">
//One week later//
Zahra, a program manager from your client, joins your next weekly meeting and presents a new request. "We've been discussing our reporting needs further, and we'd like to add a complex data visualization feature. This would allow our staff to analyze patient trends more effectively, improving the overall quality of our healthcare services."
Samantha speaks up, "That's a significant addition to the scope. It will require substantial development effort and could impact our timeline and budget."
{(if:(visited: "Proceed with reasonable assumptions."))[Jake raises his eyebrows, "Not to mention the fact that we've already made assumptions about the data integration based on limited information."
<br />]
}What do you recommend?
[[Decline the new feature request.]]
[[Renegotiate the timeline and budget.]]
[[Prioritize the new feature over other requirements.]]
{(set: $Satisfaction to it-2)
(set: $Quality to it-1)}
<img src="images/Zahra_listening.png" alt="Zahra listening">
You decide to decline the client's request to add the complex data visualization feature to the current project scope.
Turning to the client representative, you explain, "While we understand the value that this reporting feature could bring, adding it at this stage would significantly impact our project timeline and budget. We've already made assumptions about the data integration requirements based on limited information from your team."
The client representative frowns, "But this reporting capability is critical for our staff to effectively analyze patient trends and improve our healthcare services."
Samantha interjects, "We agree that it's an important feature, but attempting to incorporate it now with the incomplete requirements we have would be risky. There's a high chance it could lead to technical debt and rework down the line."
Jake adds, "It's better to deliver a solid foundation first, and then we can explore adding enhancements like this reporting feature in a future phase."
You continue, "I recommend we stay focused on delivering the core functionality within our current scope, timeline, and budget. Once we've successfully completed this initial phase, we can re-evaluate and potentially take on the reporting feature as part of a follow-up project."
The client representative sighs, "I understand your concerns. Alright, let's proceed as planned for now, but we'll need to revisit this reporting requirement as soon as possible after the initial delivery."
{(if: (visited: "Proceed with reasonable assumptions."))[ [[Continue->Data integration problems]] ]
(else:)[ [[Continue->Samantha is sick]] ] }{(set: $Satisfaction to it+2)
(set: $Quality to it+1)}
<img src="images/Zahra_listening.png" alt="Zahra listening">
After listening to Zahra's request for additional reporting capabilities, you nod thoughtfully.
"Zahra, I understand the importance of this reporting capability for your staff's ability to effectively analyze patient trends and improve healthcare services," you begin. "And we want to deliver a solution that truly meets your needs."
Zahra leans forward, her expression hopeful.
You continue, "Yes, we can incorporate this new reporting feature into the project scope. However, it's a significant addition that will require adjusting our timeline and budget."
Samantha shifts in her seat, looking relieved that you're not trying to force the new feature into the existing constraints.
"I expected as much," Zahra says with a nod. "This reporting capability is crucial for our operations, so we're willing to make the necessary adjustments if it means getting the right solution."
"Excellent," you reply. "Let's work together to renegotiate a new timeline and budget that accounts for the increased scope and complexity of adding this reporting feature."
[[Continue->Adjust the timeline]]{(set: $Satisfaction to it+1)}
<img src="images/Zahra_listening.png" alt="Zahra listening">
While it would be a significant addition to the scope, you recognize the potential value it could bring to the client's operations.
"I understand the importance of this reporting capability for your staff," you say to the Zahra. "And we want to deliver a solution that truly meets your needs."
You turn to your team, "We're going to prioritize the implementation of this new reporting feature within our current timeline and budget."
Samantha's eyes widen with concern. "But that would mean deprioritizing or removing other requirements from the scope. Are you sure that's the best option?"
Jake nods in agreement with your decision. "If this reporting feature is critical for the them, we need to find a way to make it happen."
"Exactly," you reply. Turning to Zahra, you explain, "We'll need to work closely with you to identify the requirements that can be considered lower priority for this initial phase."
Zahra seems pleased with your approach. "Thank you for your flexibility. We're willing to have an open discussion about prioritizing the most essential features for this release."
[[Continue->Adjust priorities]]{(set: $ElapsedDays to it+14)}
<img src="images/Samantha_talking2.png" alt="Samantha talking">
//Two weeks later//
You receive a meeting request from Samantha, the lead developer. Concerned, you gather with her and Jake in her office.
"I'm afraid I have some bad news," Samantha begins, her brow furrowed. "While implementing the data integration layer, we've uncovered some significant issues with the architectural assumptions we made earlier."
She pulls up a diagram on her screen, pointing to various components. "Based on the limited requirements we had, we assumed a certain flow of data between these modules. However, after further analysis, it's become clear that this approach won't work seamlessly with the client's existing systems."
Samantha lets out a frustrated sigh. "I knew making those assumptions could come back to bite us."
Samantha continues, "If we proceed with the current architecture, we're looking at potential performance bottlenecks, compatibility issues, and a suboptimal user experience. Addressing these problems down the line would be costly and time-consuming."
You realize that the team is facing a critical juncture in the project.
What do you recommend?
[[Proceed with the current architecture.]]
[[Rework the architecture.]]
[[Consult with the client.]]{(set: $Quality to it-1)}
<img src="images/Samantha_talking3.png" alt="Samantha talking">
Despite Samantha's warnings, you decide to proceed with the current architectural approach to maintain the project's timeline and budget.
Samantha reluctantly agrees, "Alright, we'll move forward as planned, but I want to document these potential issues thoroughly. If they do materialize, we'll need to address them promptly."
Jake is more optimistic. "I think it will be OK. We can make it work with the current architecture."
[[Continue->Samantha is sick]] {(set: $Quality to it+2)}
<img src="images/Samantha_sitting.png" alt="Samantha leans back in a chair">
"I understand the implications of this decision," you tell the team, "but delivering a robust solution that meets the client's needs is our top priority."
Samantha looks relieved. "Thank you. Reworking the architecture is the right call, even if it means additional time and effort."
Jake nods, although his expression is slightly concerned. "I'll do whatever it takes to get this right, but we need to be transparent with the client about the potential impacts on our timeline and budget."
You agree, knowing that open communication with the client is crucial in this situation.
[[Tell the client about reworking the architecture]]{(set: $Satisfaction to it+1)
(set: $Days to it+3)}
<img src="images/Zahra_listening.png" alt="Zahra listening">
"Zahra, I'm afraid we've run into a significant problem with the architectural approach we've taken," you begin. "Based on the assumptions we made earlier, we've implemented a data integration layer that is proving incompatible with your existing systems."
Zahra frowns, clearly concerned. "How bad is it?"
Samantha steps in to explain the technical details. "If we proceed with the current architecture, we're looking at potential performance bottlenecks, compatibility issues, and a suboptimal user experience for your staff. Addressing these problems later on would be incredibly costly and time-consuming."
Jake adds, "And we wouldn't have encountered these issues if we had waited for the complete requirements from your team in the first place."
Zahra sighs, rubbing her temples. "I understand the temptation to move forward based on assumptions, but you're right – we should have provided those requirements sooner."
You nod, appreciating Zahra's acknowledgment of the shared responsibility. "At this point, we have a few options to consider. We could proceed with the current architecture and hope for the best, but that carries significant risks. Alternatively, we could rework the architecture to address these compatibility issues, but that would likely result in delays and additional costs."
Zahra considers your words carefully. "What would you recommend?"
[[Recommend reworking the architecture.]]
[[Recommend proceeding with the current architecture.]]{<!--$RemainingDays needs to be in the footer so it recalculates correctly on each passage-->
(set: $RemainingDays to $Days - $ElapsedDays)}
<h3>''Project Status''</h3>
|=
''Total Days to Completion''
$Days
''Elapsed Days''
$ElapsedDays
''Days Remaining until Completion''
$RemainingDays
''Total Cost''
(print: "$" + (digit-format: "##,##0.00", $Cost))
=|
(meter: bind $Quality, 12, "X===", "Quality", (gradient: 90, 0, red, 1, green))
(meter: bind $Satisfaction, 12, "X===", "Satisfaction", (gradient: 90, 0, red, 1, green))
|==|{(set: $Quality to it-1)}
<img src="images/Jake_serious.png" alt="Jake leaning forward">
You decide to trust in Jake's abilities and have him take over the lead architectural role during Samantha's absence.
"Jake, I know it's a lot of pressure, but I have confidence in your experience and expertise," you say. "You'll need to step up and make the critical architectural decisions until Samantha returns."
Jake nods, a determined look on his face. "I'll do my best to uphold the high standards we've set for this project."
Alex chimes in, "I'll support Jake in any way I can, especially when it comes to ensuring the user experience aligns with the architectural choices."
The team proceeds with Jake at the helm of the architectural decisions.
[[Continue->Data integration roadblock]]{(set: $Quality to it+1)
(set: $Cost to it+10000)
(set: $ElapsedDays to it+3)
(set: $Days to it+3)}
<img src="images/Elena_working.png" alt="Elena, a Latina woman in her mid-40s wearing glasses and a purple blouse, working at a computer">
Recognizing the complexity of the client's systems and the limitations of your team's knowledge, you decide to bring in an external consultant to provide guidance and support Jake's architectural decisions until Samantha returns.
You quickly identify and engage a highly regarded consultant, Elena Navarro, who has extensive experience working with the client's systems and integration requirements.
Elena hits the ground running, working closely with Jake and the team to review the architectural plans and identify potential risks or compatibility issues. Her deep expertise proves invaluable, and she helps steer the team in the right direction, ensuring that the architectural choices align with the client's intricate data flow and security requirements.
[[Continue->Flaw in component]]{(set: $ElapsedDays to it+7)
(set: $Cost to it+2000)
(set: $Satisfaction to it-2)}
<img src="images/Zahra_phone.png" alt="Zahra on the phone looking frustrated">
//A week later//
One week into Samantha's illness, you get a call from Zahra. "What's going on with the project? The status update says nothing has been done on the project for the last week."
"Yes, that's true. Unfortunately, our lead developer is seriously ill, so we've put the project on hold until she returns," you explain.
"Oh no, I'm sorry to hear that. How much longer will she be out?"
"We're not really sure...at least one more week, I believe."
"Oof! While I understand that these things happen, we really can't afford to delay the project for so long. Isn't there any way to get things moving again? Can someone else on your team take over, or maybe bring in an external resource?"
What do you tell Zahra you will do?
[[Ask Jake to take over the project->Proceed with Jake leading the architecture.]]
[[Bring in an external consultant->Hire a temporary contractor.]]
{(set: $ElapsedDays to it +7)
(set: $Days to it+7)}
<img src="images/Jake_talking2.png" alt="Jake talking">
//One week later//
A week into Samantha's absence, you receive an urgent call from Jake. "We've hit a roadblock," he says, frustration evident in his voice. "I've been reviewing the integration points with the client's systems, and there are some complexities that I didn't fully anticipate."
Jake explains that the data flow and security requirements are more intricate than initially understood, and he's unsure how to proceed without risking compatibility issues or compromising the system's integrity.
You call an emergency meeting with Jake and Alex to discuss the situation.
{(if: (visited: "Proceed with reasonable assumptions."))[
"I should have listened to Samantha's concerns earlier," Jake admits. "Without her deep understanding of the client's systems, I'm not confident in my architectural choices."]
(else:)[Jake sighs and looks down. "I admit, I'm in a little over my head. Without Samantha's deep understanding of the client's systems, I'm not confident in my architectural choices."]}
Alex weighs in, "We can't afford to make uninformed decisions that could jeopardize the entire project."
You realize now that you've wasted a week of time and effort when you could have made a better choice.
How do you proceed?
[[Bring in a consultant.->Hire a temporary contractor.]]
[[Rework the architecture.->Rework architecture after Samantha is sick]]
[[Put the project on hold until Samantha returns.]]{(set: $ElapsedDays to it+3)}
<img src="images/Jake_arms_crossed.png" alt="Jake with his arms crossed">
A few days later, you receive an email from Samantha informing you that she has fallen seriously ill. She'll be out of work for at least two weeks.
You call an urgent meeting with Jake and Alex to discuss how to handle Samantha's absence.
Jake speaks up first, "This is a significant setback. Samantha is our lead architect, and her expertise is crucial during this implementation phase."
Alex nods in agreement, "There's a higher risk of overlooking critical details."
You turn to Jake, "As the senior developer, you'll need to step up and take the lead on the architectural decisions in Samantha's absence."
Jake hesitates, "I'll do my best, but I'm not as deeply versed in the intricacies of the client's systems as Samantha is. We may need to reconsider our options."
Alex suggests, "Perhaps we could bring in a temporary contractor who specializes in this type of integration? It could help bridge the gap until Samantha returns."
What do you do next?
[[Proceed with Jake leading the architecture.]]
[[Hire a temporary contractor.]]
[[Put the project on hold until Samantha returns.]]{(set: $ElapsedDays to it+3)}
<img src="images/Jake_worried.png" alt="Jake looks worried">
//Three days later//
A few days later, you receive another call from Jake.
"We have a new challenge," he says, sounding concerned. "We just identified a critical flaw in one of the core components we've already implemented. It's a fundamental issue that could compromise the entire system's performance and scalability."
Jake explains that addressing this flaw will require a significant rework of the component, potentially setting the project back by several weeks and increasing costs.
You gather the team{(If: (visited: "Hire a temporary contractor."))[, including Elena,]} to discuss the best course of action.
"This is a serious issue," {(If: (visited: "Hire a temporary contractor."))[Elena] (else:) [Jake]} warns. "Ignoring it or implementing a quick fix could lead to catastrophic failures down the line, especially as the system scales to handle more data and users."
You have three options:
[[Rework the component.]]
[[Implement a temporary workaround.]]
[[Consult with the client.->Consult with the client on the component issue.]]{(set: $Quality to it+2)
(set: $Days to it+14)
(set: $Cost to it+10000)}
<img src="images/Jake_relieved.png" alt="Jake looking relieved">
After carefully considering the options, you decide to approve the rework of the identified component, prioritizing the long-term quality and stability of the system over short-term expediency.
"I understand the implications of this decision," you tell the team. "But delivering a quality solution is our top priority. We can't risk compromising the system's performance and scalability by ignoring this critical flaw."
{(If: (visited: "Hire a temporary contractor."))[Elena nods in agreement. "It's the right call. Addressing this issue now will ensure a solid architectural foundation for the future."
<br />]}Jake looks relieved. "I'm glad we're taking the necessary steps to get this right, even if it means additional time and effort."
The team dives into the rework{(If: (visited: "Hire a temporary contractor."))[, with Elena providing invaluable guidance and oversight throughout the process]}.
[[Continue->Samantha returns]]
{(set: $Quality to it-3)
(set: $Days to it+2)
(set: $Cost to it+2000)
(set: $Satisfaction to it+1)}
<img src="images/Jake_talking.png" alt="Jake talking">
You weigh the options carefully. While the ideal solution would be to rework the component entirely, the potential delays and additional costs give you pause.
With this in mind, you decide to take a more expedient approach.
"I understand the risks of leaving this issue unaddressed," you tell the team. "However, we can't afford to derail the project with a complete rework of the component at this stage."
Jake nods, seeming relieved by your decision{(If: (visited: "Hire a temporary contractor."))[, while Elena purses her lips, clearly frustrated]}.
You continue, "Our best course of action is to implement a temporary workaround solution to mitigate the immediate risk posed by this flaw. This will allow us to stay on track with our current timeline and budget. We'll document the issue thoroughly and plan to revisit it in a future phase when we have more time and resources."
With your decision made, the team sets to work developing a temporary workaround solution to address the identified flaw. While not a permanent fix, the workaround aims to mitigate the immediate risks and allow the project to move forward without significant delays or additional costs.
[[Continue->Samantha returns]] {(set: $Satisfaction to it-1)
(set: $ElapsedDays to it+2)}
<img src="images/Zahra_unhappy.png" alt="Zahra looking disappointed">
You schedule an urgent meeting to discuss the architectural issue and its implications.
"Zahra, I'm afraid we've uncovered a significant problem," you begin. "During their review, our team identified a fundamental flaw in one of the core components we've already implemented."
Zahra's expression turns grave. "How serious is this issue?"
{(If: (visited: "Hire a temporary contractor."))[Elena](else:)[Jake]} takes the lead, explaining the technical details of the flaw and its potential impact on the system's performance and scalability. "If left unaddressed, this issue could lead to catastrophic failures down the line, especially as the system handles more data and users."
Zahra frowns, clearly disappointed by this news. "But we're already behind schedule. How long would it take to address this properly?"
Jake weighs in, "To rework the component and ensure a solid architectural foundation, we're looking at a potential delay of several weeks, possibly more."
Zahra shakes her head. "That's unacceptable. We can't afford further delays on this project. Can't we implement a temporary workaround and revisit the issue in a future phase?"
[[Implement a temporary workaround.]]
[[Try to convince Zahra to rework the component.]]{(set: $ElapsedDays to it+14)}
<img src="images/Samantha_documents.png" alt="Samantha reviews documents">
//Two weeks later//
Eventually, Samantha returns to work, fully recovered from her illness. As she rejoins the team, she's briefed on the project's progress and the architectural challenges that arose during her absence.
"I'm impressed with the way you've handled everything," Samantha says, reviewing the updates and documentation. {(if: (visited: "Hire a temporary contractor."))[It sounds like Elena's involvement was crucial.]}
Jake smiles, "It wasn't easy, so it's a good thing you're back! Hopefully we won't have any more of those challenges and delays!"
With Samantha's return and the architectural issues resolved, the team feels reinvigorated and confident in their ability to deliver a high-quality solution that meets the client's needs. The project may have faced setbacks, but the commitment to excellence has prevailed.
[[View feedback]]This passage will have feedback messages.
Max Days 105
Max Satisfaction 12?
Max Quality 15{<!--In this passage, the total days for the project is calculated differently depending on whether you decided to keep working while waiting for the data or not.-->
(set: $ElapsedDays to it+14)
(set: $Quality to it+2)
(if: (visited: "Wait for client input."))[(set: $Days to it+14)]
(else: )[(set: $Days to it+7)]
}
<img src="images/Alex_talking.png" alt="Alex, a 50-something Asian man with slightly graay hair, talking in a conference room">
Over the next two weeks, you follow up repeatedly with the client, emphasizing the importance of receiving the missing requirements to avoid further delays.
Finally, the client provides the detailed data integration specifications you've been waiting for.
You call an urgent meeting with the team to review the new information.
Samantha studies the documents intently. "This is exactly what we needed," she says with a nod. "With these requirements, we can properly design the architecture and implement the data integration layer without making risky assumptions."
Jake chimes in, "You were right, and I'm glad we waited. It would have been a nightmare trying to retrofit our assumptions to align with these specifications."
Alex adds, "And now we can ensure a seamless user experience that accurately reflects the client's data flow and reporting needs."
[[Continue->New Request]]{(set: $ElapsedDays to it + 3)
(set: $Quality to it-1)}
<img src="images/Samantha_talking2.png" alt="Samantha talking">
Over the next few days, you facilitate meetings with the client and your team to carefully review and prioritize the project requirements. Through a collaborative process, you identify several less critical features that can be deferred to a future phase, creating room in the scope to accommodate the new reporting capability.
Samantha remains skeptical. "I'm still concerned about the potential impact on the user experience if we remove too many features."
Alex weighs in, "I'll work closely with the client to ensure the reporting feature is seamlessly integrated and doesn't compromise the overall user experience."
With the priorities realigned and the new reporting feature taking precedence, the team adjusts their plans and proceeds with development.
[[Continue->Samantha is sick]] {(set: $ElapsedDays to it+3)
(set: $Days to it+14)
(set: $Quality to it+3)
(set: $Cost to it+10000)
(set: $Satisfaction to it+2)}
<img src="images/Zahra_listening2.png" alt="Zahra smiling">
Over the next few days, you work closely with Zahra and her team to reassess the project requirements, timeline, and budget. You're able to agree on a revised schedule and budget that accommodate the new reporting feature while still maintaining a reasonable level of quality, cost, and time trade-offs.
With the renegotiated terms in place, the development team adjusts their plans and proceeds with the expanded scope of work.
[[Continue->Samantha is sick]] {(set: $Days to it+17)
(set: $ElapsedDays to it+2)
(set: $Cost to it+15000)
(set: $Quality to it+2)}
<img src="images/Zahra_unhappy.png" alt="Zahra looking disappointed">
You schedule a meeting with the Zahra, the client's project lead, to discuss the architectural issues and the need for a rework.
During the meeting, you present the problems identified by the development team, highlighting the risks of proceeding with the current architectural approach.
Zahra listens intently, her brow furrowed with concern.
"To ensure we deliver a high-quality solution that meets your requirements and integrates seamlessly with your existing systems, we recommend reworking the architecture," you continue. "However, this will likely result in delays to our project timeline and an increase in overall costs."
Zahra considers the information for a moment before responding. "While I'm disappointed to hear about these issues, I appreciate your transparency. I want to hear some more about exactly how much extra time and money it will take, but I'm inclined to take the time to do it right."
{(if: (visited: "Samantha is sick"))[ [[Continue->Flaw in component]] ]
(else: )[ [[Continue->Start reworking]] ]}{(set: $ElapsedDays to it+5)
(set: $Quality to it+2)
(set: $Cost to it+5000)}
<img src="images/Samantha_working.png" alt="Samantha working at a computer">
With the client's understanding and approval, the team begins the arduous process of reworking the system architecture. Samantha takes the lead, working closely with Jake and the other developers to design a new architectural approach that addresses the identified issues and aligns with the client's requirements.
{(if: (visited: "Proceed with reasonable assumptions."))[ [[Continue->Data integration problems]] ]
(else:)[ [[Continue->Samantha is sick]] ] }{(set: $Quality to it+1)}
<img src="images/Jake_arms_crossed.png" alt="Jake with his arms crossed">
You recognize the gravity of the situation. Proceeding with the current approach risks delivering a suboptimal solution that could lead to performance bottlenecks, compatibility problems, and a poor user experience.
Jake nods, although his expression is slightly concerned. "I'll do whatever it takes to get this right, but we need to be transparent with the client about the potential impacts on our timeline and budget."
You agree, knowing that open communication with the client is crucial in this situation.
[[Continue->Tell the client about reworking the architecture]]{(set: $Satisfaction to it+3)
(set: $Quality to it+2)
(set: $Days to it+14)
(set: $Cost to it+10000)}
{(If: (visited: "Hire a temporary contractor."))
<img src="images/Elena_talking.png" alt="Elena talking">
<br />
[Elena leans forward, her expression serious.]
(else:)
<img src="images/Jake_serious.png" alt="Jake with a serious expression">
<br />
[Jake leans forward, his expression serious.]}
"While a workaround might seem like a short-term solution, it would be a band-aid fix that could cause even more significant problems down the road. This is a fundamental issue that needs to be addressed properly, or we risk compromising the entire system's integrity."
You nod in agreement with your team's assessment. "I understand your concerns about the timeline, Zahra, but delivering a high-quality, robust solution is our top priority at Teklyhealth. Ignoring this issue or implementing a quick fix could have severe consequences for the project's success."
Zahra considers your words, her frustration evident. After a moment, she sighs. "As much as I hate the idea of further delays, you're right. We can't afford to cut corners and jeopardize the entire project's success."
Jake looks relieved. "I'm glad we're taking the necessary steps to get this right, even if it means additional time and effort."
The team dives into the rework.
[[Continue->Samantha returns]]
{(set: $Satisfaction to it+2)
(set: $Quality to it+1)}
<img src="images/Zahra_unhappy.png" alt="Zahra looking disappointed">
"Given the potential impact on performance, user experience, and future maintenance, my recommendation would be to rework the architecture," you say. "It's not an ideal situation, but it would ensure a robust, compatible solution that meets your needs in the long run."
After a moment of contemplation, Zahra nods. "You're right. While I'm disappointed that we're facing delays and added costs, delivering a subpar solution would only cause more headaches down the road. Let's proceed with reworking the architecture to get this project back on track."
[[Continue->Start reworking]] {(set: $Satisfaction to it+2)
(set: $Quality to it-1)}
<img src="images/Zahra_listening2.png" alt="Zahra listening">
You explain, "If the time and cost are your highest priorities, then I recommend staying with the current architecture."
Zahra asks, "What about the risks?"
"We'll mitigate those as much as possible as we move through the project, and we'll document everything we're doing. This should be enough to get us to the initial launch as planned."
"What about the long-term effects?"
"In the long run, we can plan to make those changes in future updates," you explain.
Zahra nods. "OK, that sounds like a reasonable approach. We'll manage the scope for now and delay that additional work until later."
[[Continue->Samantha is sick]]